Prepare for the OSH Security Test with comprehensive quizzes featuring flashcards and multiple choice questions, complete with hints and detailed explanations. Ace your exam!

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.


The Criminal Code of Canada allows:

  1. Special authorities for police officers and security guards

  2. Security guards the same authorities as other private citizens

  3. Security guards to use reasonable force arresting people named on a warrant

  4. Prevents security guards using force to remove trespassers

The correct answer is: Security guards the same authorities as other private citizens

The correct choice highlights that security guards possess the same authorities as private citizens, which means they do not have any additional powers granted by the Criminal Code of Canada beyond those held by everyday individuals. This understanding is crucial because it outlines the role and limitations of security personnel in terms of enforcing the law. In Canada, the Criminal Code does not specifically provide security guards with any special powers that exceed those of private citizens, such as making arrests or using force in a manner that law enforcement officers might. Their authority is mainly to observe, report, and assist law enforcement when necessary, rather than to assume additional powers. The other options refer to powers or rights that are not granted to security personnel under Canadian law. The notion of special authorities for police officers and security guards implies that security guards would have law enforcement powers similar to police, which is not accurate. The reference to using reasonable force to arrest someone with a warrant also misrepresents the legal framework, as only peace officers are typically allowed to make arrests based on warrants. Lastly, the claim that security guards are prevented from using any force to remove trespassers isn't entirely correct; they can use reasonable force to remove individuals but within the limits of what is legally acceptable, considering they don't have special legal authority