Prepare for the OSH Security Test with comprehensive quizzes featuring flashcards and multiple choice questions, complete with hints and detailed explanations. Ace your exam!

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.


What are two Acts governing admissibility of evidence?

  1. Ontario Civil Law and The Constitution Act

  2. The Criminal Code of Canada and PIPEDA

  3. Tort Law and the Employment Standards Act

  4. Canada Evidence Act and Ontario Evidence Act

The correct answer is: Canada Evidence Act and Ontario Evidence Act

The Canada Evidence Act and the Ontario Evidence Act are both fundamental pieces of legislation that govern the rules and standards of admissibility for evidence in legal proceedings in Canada. The Canada Evidence Act outlines the general principles applicable across federal jurisdictions, specifying how evidence can be presented in court, what types of evidence are admissible, and under what conditions. This ensures a consistent approach to evidence in federal court matters. The Ontario Evidence Act serves a similar purpose at the provincial level, addressing the specifics of evidence law in Ontario. It complements the federal statute by detailing the rules applied in Ontario courts, including provisions related to hearsay, witness testimony, and documentary evidence. Together, these two Acts create a framework for ensuring that evidence is reliable and relevant, thus preserving the integrity of the legal process. The other choices refer to laws that do not primarily focus on admissibility of evidence. The Constitution Act, while foundational to Canadian law, does not specifically govern evidence admissibility. The Criminal Code of Canada addresses criminal law and procedures but is not focused solely on evidence admissibility. PIPEDA pertains to privacy and data protection, not to evidentiary rules. Similarly, Tort Law and the Employment Standards Act deal with civil liabilities and labor rights, respectively, rather than the