OSH Security Practice Test

What is the best definition of ‘admissible evidence’?

1. Relevant evidence to a proceeding that has not been excluded by a judge

2. Evidence that the defense wishes to have tossed

3. Best evidence rule

4. None of the above

The correct answer is: Relevant evidence to a proceeding that has not been excluded by a judge

The best definition of 'admissible evidence' is relevant evidence to a proceeding that has not been excluded by a judge. Admissible evidence is crucial in legal proceedings because it directly influences the decision-making process of the judge or jury. Evidence must be both relevant to the case at hand and accepted by the court, meaning it complies with legal standards. The concept of relevance ensures that the evidence relates to the facts of the case and can help establish a point in a dispute. Additionally, judges have the authority to exclude certain evidence due to various reasons, such as unreliability or prejudicial impact that outweighs its probative value. This definition encapsulates both the importance and the criteria for evidence to be considered admissible in a legal context. The other options do not accurately capture the essence of what makes evidence admissible in court. For example, evidence that the defense wishes to have tossed overlooks the broader legal framework and criteria judges apply when determining admissibility. The best evidence rule refers to a specific principle regarding the presentation of evidence rather than providing a comprehensive definition of admissible evidence itself.